Biomarkers of Aging & accelerated Aging

Biomarkers of aging are biomarkers that could predict functional capacity at some later age better than will chronological age.[1] Stated another way, biomarkers of agingwould give the true “biological age”, which may be different from the chronological age.

Validated biomarkers of aging would allow for testing interventions to extend lifespan, because changes in the biomarkers would be observable throughout the lifespan of the organism.[1] Although maximum lifespan would be a means of validating biomarkers of aging, it would not be a practical means for long-lived species such as humans because longitudinal studies would take far too much time.[2] Ideally, biomarkers of aging should assay the biological process of aging and not a predisposition to disease, should cause a minimal amount of trauma to assay in the organism, and should be reproducibly measurable during a short interval compared to the lifespan of the organism.[1]

Although graying of hair increases with age,[3] hair graying cannot be called a biomarker of ageing. Similarly, skin wrinkles and other common changes seen with aging are not better indicators of future functionality than chronological age.

Biogerontologists have continued efforts to find and validate biomarkers of aging, but success thus far has been limited. Levels of CD4 and CD8 memory T cells and naive T cells have been used to give good predictions of the expected lifespan of middle-aged mice.[4]

Advances in big data analysis allowed for the new types of “aging clocks” to be developed. The epigenetic clock is a promising biomarker of aging and can accurately predict human chronological age.[5] Basic blood biochemistry and cell counts can also be used to accurately predict the chronological age.[6] Further studies of the hematological clock on the large datasets from South Korean, Canadian, and Eastern European populations demonstrated that biomarkers of aging may be population-specific and predictive of mortality.[7] It is also possible to predict the human chronological age using the transcriptomic clock.[8]

The recent introduction of low-power and compact sensors, based on micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) has led to a new breed of the wearable and affordable devices providing unparalleled opportunities for the collecting and cloud-storing personal digitized activity records. Consequently, modern deep machine learningtechniques could be used to produce a proof-of-concept digital biomarker of age in the form of all-causes-mortality predictor from a sufficiently large collection of one week long human physical activity streams augmented by the rich clinical data (including the death register, as provided by, e.g., the NHANES study).[9]

A new epigenetic mark found in studies of aging cells is the loss of histones. Most of the evidence shows that loss of histones is linked to cell division. In aging and dividing yeast MNase-seq (Micrococcal Nuclease sequencing) showed a loss of nucleosomes of ~50%. Proper histone dosage is important in yeast as shown from the extended lifespans seen in strains that are overexpressing histones.[10] A consequence of histone loss in yeast is the amplification of transcription. In younger cells, genes that are most induced with age have specific chromatin structures, such as fuzzy nuclear positioning, lack of a nuclesome depleted region (NDR) at the promoter, weak chromatin phasing, a higher frequency of TATA elements, and higher occupancy of repressive chromatin factors. In older cells, however, the same genes nucleosome loss at the promoter is more prevalent which leads to higher transcription of these genes.[10]

This phenomenon is not only seen in yeast, but has also been seen in aging worms, during aging of human diploid primary fibroblasts, and in senescent human cells. In human primary fibroblasts, reduced synthesis of new histones was seen to be a consequence of shortened telomeres that activate the DNA damage response. Loss of core histones may be a general epigenetic mark of aging across many organisms.[11]

In addition to the core histones, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, there are other versions of the histone proteins that can be significantly different in their sequence and are important for regulating chromatin dynamics. Histone H3.3 is a variant of histone H3 that is incorporated into the genome independent of replication. It is the major form of histone H3 seen in the chromatin of senescent human cells, and it appears that excess H3.3 can drive senescence.[11]

There are multiple variants of histone 2, the one most notably implicated in aging is macroH2A. The function of macroH2A has generally been assumed to be transcriptional silencing; most recently, it has been suggested that macroH2A is important in repressing transcription at Senescence-Associated Heterochromatin Foci (SAHF).[11] Chromatin that contains macroH2A is impervious to ATP-dependent remodeling proteins and to the binding of transcription factors.[12]

Increased acetylation of histones contributes to chromatin taking a more euchromatic state as an organism ages, similar to the increased transcription seen due to the loss of histones.[13] There is also a reduction in the levels of H3K56ac during aging and an increase in the levels of H4K16ac.[10] Increased H4K16ac in old yeast cells is associated with the decline in levels of the HDAC Sir2, which can increase the life span when overexpressed.[10]

Methylation of histones has been tied to life span regulation in many organisms, specifically H3K4me3, an activating mark, and H4K27me3, a repressing mark. In C. elegans, the loss of any of the three Trithorax proteins that catalyze the trimethylation of H3K4 such as, WDR-5 and the methyltransferases SET-2 and ASH-2, lowers the levels of H3K4me3 and increases lifespan. Loss of the enzyme that demethylates H3K4me3, RB-2, increases H3K4me3 levels in C. elegans and decreases their life spans.[13] In the rhesus macaque brain prefrontal cortex, H3K4me2 increases at promoters and enhancers during postnatal development and aging.[14] These increases reflect progressively more active and transcriptionally accessible (or open) chromatin structures that are often associated with stress responses such as the DNA damageresponse. These changes may form an epigenetic memory of stresses and damages experienced by the organism as it develops and ages.[14]

UTX-1, a H3K27me3 demethylase, plays a critical role in the aging of C.elegans: increased utx-1 expression correlates with a decrease in H3K27me3 and a decrease in lifespan. Utx-1 knockdowns showed an increase in lifespan[13] Changes in H3K27me3 levels also have affects on aging cells in Drosophila and humans.

Methylation of DNA is a common modification in mammalian cells. The cytosine base is methylated and becomes 5-methylcytosine, most often when in the CpG context. Hypermethylation of CpG islands is associated with transcriptional repression and hypomethylation of these sites is associated with transcriptional activation. Many studies have shown that there is a loss of DNA methylation during ageing in many species such as, rats, mice, cows, hamsters, and humans. It has also been shown that DNMT1 and DNMT3a decrease with aging and DNMT3b increases.[15]

Hypomethylation of DNA can lower genomic stability, induce the reactivation of transposable elements, and cause the loss of imprinting, all of which can contribute to cancer progression and pathogenesis.[15]

The applications of aging biomarkers are very broad. The various aging clocks may be associated with the prevalence of chronic diseases and frailty, predictive of mortality or future incidence of specific diseases.

A study of smokers and non-smokers using the hematological biomarkers of aging demonstrated that smokers in their 20s are biologically older than non-smokers.[16] An independent study of biomarkers of aging and frailty in human physical activity records revealed that the aging acceleration effect of smoking is reversible: the biological age in age- and sex-matched cohorts of smokers exceeded that of non-smokers, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in cohorts of smokers and those who quit smoking early in life [17].

  1. ^ Jump up to: a b c Baker GT, Sprott RL (1988). “Biomarkers of aging” (PDF). Experimental Gerontology. 23 (4–5): 223–39. doi:10.1016/0531-5565(88)90025-3. PMID 3058488.
  2. ^ Harrison, Ph.D., David E. (November 11, 2011). “V. Life span as a biomarker”. Jackson Laboratory. Archived from the original on April 26, 2012. Retrieved 2011-12-03.
  3. ^ Van Neste D, Tobin DJ (2004). “Hair cycle and hair pigmentation: dynamic interactions and changes associated with aging”. Micron. 35 (3): 193–200. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2003.11.006. PMID 15036274.
  4. ^ Miller RA (April 2001). “Biomarkers of aging: prediction of longevity by using age-sensitive T-cell subset determinations in a middle-aged, genetically heterogeneous mouse population”. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 56 (4): B180–6. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.4.b180. PMID 11283189.
  5. ^ Horvath S (2013). “DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types”. Genome Biology. 14 (10): R115. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. PMC 4015143. PMID 24138928.
  6. ^ Putin E, Mamoshina P, Aliper A, Korzinkin M, Moskalev A, Kolosov A, Ostrovskiy A, Cantor C, Vijg J, Zhavoronkov A (May 2016). “Deep biomarkers of human aging: Application of deep neural networks to biomarker development”. Aging. 8 (5): 1021–33. doi:10.18632/aging.100968. PMC 4931851. PMID 27191382.
  7. ^ Mamoshina P, Kochetov K, Putin E, Cortese F, Aliper A, Lee WS, Ahn SM, Uhn L, Skjodt N, Kovalchuk O, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Zhavoronkov A (October 2018). “Population Specific Biomarkers of Human Aging: A Big Data Study Using South Korean, Canadian, and Eastern European Patient Populations”. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 73 (11): 1482–1490. doi:10.1093/gerona/gly005. PMC 6175034. PMID 29340580.
  8. ^ Peters MJ, Joehanes R, Pilling LC, Schurmann C, Conneely KN, Powell J, et al. (October 2015). “The transcriptional landscape of age in human peripheral blood”. Nature Communications. 6: 8570. doi:10.1038/ncomms9570. PMC 4639797. PMID 26490707.
  9. ^ Pyrkov TV, Slipensky K, Barg M, Kondrashin A, Zhurov B, Zenin A, Pyatnitskiy M, Menshikov L, Markov S, Fedichev PO (March 2018). “Extracting biological age from biomedical data via deep learning: too much of a good thing?”. Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 5210. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23534-9. PMC 5980076. PMID 29581467.
  10. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Sen P, Shah PP, Nativio R, Berger SL (August 2016). “Epigenetic Mechanisms of Longevity and Aging”. Cell. 166 (4): 822–839. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.050. PMC 5821249. PMID 27518561.
  11. ^ Jump up to: a b c Pal S, Tyler JK (July 2016). “Epigenetics and aging”. Science Advances. 2(7): e1600584. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600584. PMC 4966880. PMID 27482540.
  12. ^ Zhang R, Poustovoitov MV, Ye X, Santos HA, Chen W, Daganzo SM, et al. (January 2005). “Formation of MacroH2A-containing senescence-associated heterochromatin foci and senescence driven by ASF1a and HIRA”. Developmental Cell. 8 (1): 19–30. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.019. PMID 15621527.
  13. ^ Jump up to: a b c McCauley BS, Dang W (December 2014). “Histone methylation and aging: lessons learned from model systems”. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1839 (12): 1454–62. doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.05.008. PMC 4240748. PMID 24859460.
  14. ^ Jump up to: a b Han Y, Han D, Yan Z, Boyd-Kirkup JD, Green CD, Khaitovich P, Han JD (December 2012). “Stress-associated H3K4 methylation accumulates during postnatal development and aging of rhesus macaque brain”. Aging Cell. 11 (6): 1055–64. doi:10.1111/acel.12007. PMID 22978322.
  15. ^ Jump up to: a b Lillycrop KA, Hoile SP, Grenfell L, Burdge GC (August 2014). “DNA methylation, ageing and the influence of early life nutrition”. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 73 (3): 413–21. doi:10.1017/S0029665114000081. PMID 25027290.
  16. ^ Mamoshina P, Kochetov K, Cortese F, Kovalchuk A, Aliper A, Putin E, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Cantor C, Skjodt N, Kovalchuk O, Zhavoronkov A (January 2019). “Blood Biochemistry Analysis to Detect Smoking Status and Quantify Accelerated Aging in Smokers”. Scientific Reports (9). doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35704-w. PMC 6333803. PMID 30644411.
  17. ^ Pyrkov TV, Getmantsev E, Zhurov B, Avchaciov K, Pyatnitskiy M, Menshikov L, Khodova K, Gudkov AV, Fedichev PO (October 2018). “Quantitative characterization of biological age and frailty based on locomotor activity records”. Aging (Albany NY) (10). doi:10.18632/aging.101603. PMC 6224248. PMID 30362959.

error: Content is protected !!